<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Federal Government&#8217;s Latest Takeover: Your Desktop?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenewnewinternet.com/2009/08/11/the-federal-governments-latest-takeover-your-desktop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenewnewinternet.com/2009/08/11/the-federal-governments-latest-takeover-your-desktop/</link>
	<description>The Latest News in Cybersecurity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:47:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewnewinternet.com/2009/08/11/the-federal-governments-latest-takeover-your-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewnewinternet.com/?p=1358#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Laugh out loud.  This is funny.  I enjoy Glenn Beck as much as the next guy, and I have no doubt that the policy statement (found by clicking at the bottom of the cars.gov page under Policies) will provide an exceptional means for attorneys to generate revenue.  Lawyers from both sides of the argument will charge thousands to millions of dollars to establish the legitimacey of some poorly written policy.

Working in government contracting, I have seen more than my fair share of poorly written policies, and have seen them rewritten, sometimes with little improvement.  The crux of the matter is that the Government, like any organization, has a vested interest in protecting their infrastructure.  With that in mind, the job of the IT security team becomes very challenging as the reality of a connected world comes into play.  Where does “my network” end?  If your computer is talking to mine…you are on my network!  What should I have the POTENTIAL capability to influence to protect my infrastructure and information?

Given these questions, it is no wonder that DOT has put in place a policy such as this.  Does that mean that …

-	The policy should not be more reflective of individual privacy concerns?  YES
-	That there should be grave concerns that “Big Brother” is trying to get into your computer?  NO (If you haven’t noticed …Uncle Sam and the dedicated people who are supporting him have their hands full with the bad guys and the users in their organizations.)
-	That you should exercise reasonable care with ANY website, governmental, organizational or otherwise to protect your own data?  ABSOLUTELY

Glenn, thanks for a good laugh and for the soapbox for me to highlight the intrinsic dangers to our privacy…among the least of which is the Government, in this instance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laugh out loud.  This is funny.  I enjoy Glenn Beck as much as the next guy, and I have no doubt that the policy statement (found by clicking at the bottom of the cars.gov page under Policies) will provide an exceptional means for attorneys to generate revenue.  Lawyers from both sides of the argument will charge thousands to millions of dollars to establish the legitimacey of some poorly written policy.</p>
<p>Working in government contracting, I have seen more than my fair share of poorly written policies, and have seen them rewritten, sometimes with little improvement.  The crux of the matter is that the Government, like any organization, has a vested interest in protecting their infrastructure.  With that in mind, the job of the IT security team becomes very challenging as the reality of a connected world comes into play.  Where does “my network” end?  If your computer is talking to mine…you are on my network!  What should I have the POTENTIAL capability to influence to protect my infrastructure and information?</p>
<p>Given these questions, it is no wonder that DOT has put in place a policy such as this.  Does that mean that …</p>
<p>-	The policy should not be more reflective of individual privacy concerns?  YES<br />
-	That there should be grave concerns that “Big Brother” is trying to get into your computer?  NO (If you haven’t noticed …Uncle Sam and the dedicated people who are supporting him have their hands full with the bad guys and the users in their organizations.)<br />
-	That you should exercise reasonable care with ANY website, governmental, organizational or otherwise to protect your own data?  ABSOLUTELY</p>
<p>Glenn, thanks for a good laugh and for the soapbox for me to highlight the intrinsic dangers to our privacy…among the least of which is the Government, in this instance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExecutiveBiz Blog&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Feds Are &#8220;In-Sourcing&#8221; GovCon Jobs&#8230;Get Used to It?</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewnewinternet.com/2009/08/11/the-federal-governments-latest-takeover-your-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>ExecutiveBiz Blog&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Feds Are &#8220;In-Sourcing&#8221; GovCon Jobs&#8230;Get Used to It?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewnewinternet.com/?p=1358#comment-63</guid>
		<description>[...] on the website for the federal government&#8217;s &#8220;Cash for Clunkers&#8221; program technically transfers ownership of the computer accessing the site to the federal government while connected to www.cars.gov.  Don&#8217;t try this at home, because the warning reads [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the website for the federal government&#8217;s &#8220;Cash for Clunkers&#8221; program technically transfers ownership of the computer accessing the site to the federal government while connected to <a href="http://www.cars.gov. " rel="nofollow">http://www.cars.gov. </a> Don&#8217;t try this at home, because the warning reads [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

